Who Wrote Shakespeare? The Oxfordian Theory

Introduction

For centuries, the works of William Shakespeare have captivated audiences worldwide, inspiring countless adaptations, analyses, and debates. However, one question continues to intrigue scholars and enthusiasts alike: Who really wrote the plays and sonnets attributed to the Bard of Avon? Among the various alternative authorship theories, the Oxfordian theory stands out as one of the most compelling and widely discussed.

The Oxfordian theory proposes that Edward de Vere, the 17th Earl of Oxford, was the true author behind Shakespeare's works. This article delves into the fascinating world of Oxfordian Shakespeare, exploring the evidence, arguments, and implications of this controversial theory.

Watch Full Video

The Origins of the Oxfordian Theory

The Oxfordian theory of Shakespeare authorship emerged in the early 20th century, challenging the traditional belief that William Shakespeare of Stratford-upon-Avon was the true author of the plays and poems attributed to him. J. Thomas Looney, an English schoolteacher, first proposed the theory in his 1920 book "'Shakespeare' Identified in Edward de Vere, the Seventeenth Earl of Oxford."

Looney's work sparked a movement that has since gained traction among scholars, writers, and even some notable figures in the entertainment industry. The Oxfordian theory has become one of the most prominent alternative authorship theories, alongside others such as the Baconian theory and the Marlovian theory.

Key Arguments for the Oxfordian Theory

1. Education and Knowledge

One of the primary arguments for the Oxfordian theory is the vast knowledge displayed in Shakespeare's works. Edward de Vere received a superior education at Cambridge University and Gray's Inn, and he was known for his literary talents. Oxfordians argue that the depth of knowledge in law, medicine, foreign languages, and court life evident in Shakespeare's plays aligns more closely with de Vere's background than with the limited formal education of William Shakespeare of Stratford.

2. Travel and Italian Influence

Many of Shakespeare's plays are set in Italy and demonstrate an intimate knowledge of Italian culture, geography, and customs. Edward de Vere traveled extensively in Italy, spending nearly a year there in 1575-1576. Oxfordians contend that this firsthand experience is reflected in the plays, whereas there is no evidence that William Shakespeare ever left England.

3. Literary Patronage and Court Connections

Edward de Vere was a prominent figure in Queen Elizabeth I's court and a known patron of the arts. He sponsored several literary and theatrical companies, including Oxford's Men. Oxfordians argue that this position would have given him the necessary connections and resources to produce the plays attributed to Shakespeare, as well as insight into the political intrigues often depicted in the works.

4. The "Shakespeare" Authorship Question

Oxfordians point to various inconsistencies and mysteries surrounding the life of William Shakespeare of Stratford. These include the lack of surviving manuscripts in Shakespeare's hand, the absence of books in his will, and the scarcity of contemporary references to him as a writer during his lifetime. They argue that these gaps in the historical record are more consistent with a nobleman writing under a pseudonym than with the traditional narrative of Shakespeare's authorship.

Challenges to the Oxfordian Theory

While the Oxfordian theory has gained a significant following, it faces several challenges and criticisms from mainstream Shakespeare scholars:

1. Chronology: Edward de Vere died in 1604, before several of Shakespeare's plays were believed to have been written or performed. Oxfordians argue that these dates are incorrect or that the plays were written earlier and revised later.
2. Lack of Direct Evidence: There is no explicit contemporary evidence linking Edward de Vere to the authorship of Shakespeare's works. Critics argue that if de Vere were the true author, some clear indication would have survived.
3. Contemporary Recognition: William Shakespeare was recognized as a writer by his contemporaries, including Ben Jonson and Francis Meres. Stratfordians argue that this recognition is strong evidence for his authorship.
4. Stylistic Differences: Some scholars argue that de Vere's known writings differ significantly in style and quality from Shakespeare's works.

The Impact of the Oxfordian Theory on Shakespeare Studies

Regardless of one's stance on the authorship question, the Oxfordian theory has had a significant impact on Shakespeare studies:

1. Renewed Interest in Biography: The debate has sparked a renewed interest in the biographical details of both William Shakespeare and Edward de Vere, leading to more comprehensive research into the Elizabethan era.
2. Interdisciplinary Approach: The Oxfordian theory has encouraged an interdisciplinary approach to Shakespeare studies, incorporating fields such as history, law, and cryptography.
3. Critical Analysis: The theory has prompted scholars to critically examine the assumptions underlying traditional Shakespeare biography and to reassess the evidence for authorship.
4. Public Engagement: The authorship debate has captured public imagination, leading to increased interest in Shakespeare's works and the historical context in which they were created.

Practical Applications of the Oxfordian Theory

For writers, content creators, and AI enthusiasts, the Oxfordian theory offers interesting applications:

1. Creative Writing: The theory provides a rich source of inspiration for historical fiction or alternative history narratives. Writers can explore the potential implications of de Vere's authorship in their storytelling.
2. Content Analysis: The debate surrounding Oxfordian Shakespeare offers an excellent case study in content analysis and optimization. By examining the arguments for and against the theory, content creators can learn to critically evaluate sources and construct persuasive narratives.
3. AI Text Generation: The Oxfordian theory presents an intriguing challenge for AI text humanization tools. Could an AI be trained to write in the style of Shakespeare while incorporating elements of Edward de Vere's known writings and experiences?
4. Educational Resources: Educators can use the authorship debate to teach critical thinking skills, encouraging students to evaluate evidence and construct arguments based on historical and literary analysis.

Conclusion

The Oxfordian theory of Shakespeare authorship continues to captivate scholars, writers, and enthusiasts worldwide. While the debate remains unresolved, it has undoubtedly enriched our understanding of Shakespeare's works and the Elizabethan era in which they were created.

For those interested in exploring the theory further, numerous resources are available, including books, academic journals, and online forums dedicated to the authorship question. Whether you're a seasoned Shakespeare scholar or a curious reader, the Oxfordian theory offers a fascinating lens through which to view one of literature's greatest mysteries.

As we continue to grapple with questions of authorship and creativity in the digital age, the Shakespeare authorship debate serves as a reminder of the enduring power of words and the complex relationship between art, identity, and historical truth.

For those looking to delve deeper into the world of AI-assisted writing while exploring literary theories like the Oxfordian Shakespeare, consider exploring AI text humanization tools. These advanced technologies can help writers and researchers analyze complex literary styles, generate creative content, and even attempt to mimic the distinctive voice of Shakespeare – or perhaps Edward de Vere – in their own work.