Shakespeare's True Identity? The Oxford Theory

Introduction

For centuries, William Shakespeare has been revered as one of the greatest playwrights and poets in the English language. However, a persistent question has lingered in literary circles: Was Shakespeare truly the author of the works attributed to him? Among the various alternative authorship theories, the Shakespeare Oxford theory stands out as one of the most intriguing and hotly debated.

This article delves into the controversial Shakespeare Oxford theory, exploring its origins, key arguments, and the ongoing debate surrounding the true identity of the Bard. As we unravel this literary mystery, we'll examine the evidence presented by Oxfordians and consider the implications for our understanding of Shakespeare's works.

Watch Full Video

The Shakespeare Oxford Theory: An Overview

The Shakespeare Oxford theory proposes that Edward de Vere, the 17th Earl of Oxford, was the true author of the works attributed to William Shakespeare. This theory, which gained prominence in the 20th century, challenges the traditional view of Shakespeare as the man from Stratford-upon-Avon.

Proponents of the Shakespeare Oxford theory, known as Oxfordians, argue that Edward de Vere's life experiences, education, and social standing better align with the breadth of knowledge and sophistication displayed in Shakespeare's works. They contend that de Vere used the pseudonym "William Shakespeare" to maintain anonymity due to the social stigma associated with playwriting during the Elizabethan era.

Key Arguments Supporting the Shakespeare Oxford Theory

1. Education and Knowledge

Oxfordians argue that the depth and breadth of knowledge displayed in Shakespeare's works far exceed what would have been available to a man of William Shakespeare's background. Edward de Vere, on the other hand, received a comprehensive education at Cambridge University and Gray's Inn, and had access to extensive libraries and learned tutors.

The plays attributed to Shakespeare demonstrate a vast knowledge of law, medicine, foreign languages, and court life – areas that de Vere would have been well-versed in due to his aristocratic upbringing and education.

2. Travel and Cultural References

Many of Shakespeare's plays are set in Italy and contain detailed descriptions of Italian cities and customs. Oxfordians point out that while there is no evidence of William Shakespeare ever leaving England, Edward de Vere traveled extensively throughout Europe, including a prolonged stay in Italy.

This firsthand experience, they argue, explains the intimate knowledge of Italian culture and geography found in plays like "Romeo and Juliet" and "The Merchant of Venice."

3. Literary Style and Personal Connections

Oxfordians draw parallels between de Vere's known poetic works and the style of Shakespeare's sonnets and plays. They also point to biographical similarities between de Vere's life events and themes in Shakespeare's works. For example, the character of Polonius in "Hamlet" is said to be based on William Cecil, Lord Burghley, who was de Vere's guardian and father-in-law.

4. The "Shakespeare" Name and Pseudonyms

Proponents of the Shakespeare Oxford theory argue that "William Shakespeare" was a pseudonym used by de Vere. They note that the hyphenated form "Shake-speare" appears on some early publications, suggesting it may be a pen name. Additionally, they point out that de Vere used pseudonyms for other works and that the use of pseudonyms was common among aristocratic writers of the time.

Challenges to the Shakespeare Oxford Theory

Despite its intriguing arguments, the Shakespeare Oxford theory faces significant challenges and criticism from mainstream scholars:

1. Lack of Direct Evidence: There is no concrete historical evidence directly linking Edward de Vere to the authorship of Shakespeare's works.
2. Chronological Inconsistencies: Some of Shakespeare's plays were written or performed after de Vere's death in 1604, which poses a significant problem for the Oxford theory.
3. Contemporary Recognition: There are numerous contemporary references to William Shakespeare as a writer from Stratford, including tributes from fellow playwrights and actors.
4. The First Folio: The 1623 First Folio, published seven years after Shakespeare's death, includes a dedication and introductory poem that explicitly identify the Stratford man as the author.

The Ongoing Debate and Its Implications

The Shakespeare Oxford theory continues to spark heated debates in academic and literary circles. While it remains a minority view, it has gained some notable supporters over the years, including writers Mark Twain and Henry James, and Supreme Court Justices Harry A. Blackmun and John Paul Stevens.

The ongoing controversy surrounding Shakespeare's authorship has several implications:

1. Literary Analysis: The debate encourages deeper analysis of Shakespeare's works, potentially revealing new insights into their themes and historical context.
2. Historical Research: It has spurred extensive research into Elizabethan and Jacobean literature, theater, and society.
3. Interdisciplinary Studies: The controversy brings together experts from various fields, including literature, history, and even cryptography, fostering interdisciplinary collaboration.
4. Public Engagement: The debate has sparked public interest in Shakespeare and Renaissance literature, potentially attracting new audiences to these works.

Conclusion

The Shakespeare Oxford theory presents a fascinating alternative to the traditional view of Shakespeare's authorship. While it offers intriguing arguments and has sparked valuable research and debate, it remains a controversial and minority position in academic circles.

Regardless of one's stance on the authorship question, the enduring appeal of Shakespeare's works lies in their timeless themes, complex characters, and beautiful language. As we continue to study and appreciate these masterpieces, the mystery surrounding their creation adds an extra layer of intrigue to an already rich literary legacy.

For those interested in exploring this topic further, our blog offers additional articles on Shakespeare, literary analysis, and the art of writing. Whether you're a student, researcher, or simply a lover of literature, understanding different perspectives on Shakespeare's identity can enhance your appreciation of his works.

As we navigate the complexities of historical and literary analysis, tools like AI text humanizers can be valuable for researchers and writers looking to refine their arguments and present them in a clear, engaging manner. By blending human insight with technological assistance, we can continue to explore and debate the fascinating questions surrounding Shakespeare's true identity.